Lebanon: Growth of the economy at risk without reforms

Lebanon's Finance Minister Rayya Hassan (C) speaks during a joint news conference with Lebanese central bank governor Riad Salameh (L) and International Monetary Fund mission chief Andreas Bauer in Beirut June 8, 2010.

Lebanon’s economy has surged despite global recession, but with one of the world’s highest levels of public debt, growth may not be sustainable without reforms to cut its deficit and engage the private sector.

The International Monetary Fund this week raised its 2010 growth forecast for Lebanon to at least 8 percent, citing domestic stability and prudent policies.

That would be close to 9 percent growth last year when the economy attracted capital inflows from the Gulf, and Lebanese abroad, as conservative banking regulations and strict secrecy made the country a safe haven during the financial crisis.

Rapid economic growth helped cut the debt-to-GDP ratio to 147 percent in 2009 from around 180 percent previously. But high spending will push the fiscal deficit to $3.7 billion, or 10.7 percent of GDP this year, from $3.25 billion, or 8.6 percent in 2009, according to the government.

Nominal debt, meanwhile, is set to reach $55 billion, up from $51 billion in 2009. Analysts warn that if the government does not act to cut spending and boost revenues, public debt could increase to as high as $65 billion in the next three to five years with the deficit widening even more.

The formation of a national unity government early this year ended more than four years of political instability. But seven months after taking office the cabinet has yet to endorse the 2010 budget.

“There is no political consensus on them (the reforms), there is no political will and it’s very unfortunate,” said Nassib Ghobril, head of research and analysis at Byblos Bank.

Unless the government can make progress towards liberalising key industries and overhauling the tax system, Gulf and other foreign money which has headed to sectors like real estate — as property prices nearly doubled last year — will go elsewhere.

“We are in an increasingly competitive region. Since the global crisis, competition has increased to attract funds, capital, tourism, multinationals,” said Ghobril.

The IMF suggests the government could raise revenues by introducing a capital gains tax and gradually raising value-added tax. But when Hassan suggested increasing VAT to 15 percent from 10 percent the 2010 budget was delayed for months as some politicians argued Lebanese could not afford more taxes.

“If the capital inflows decrease … we will be forced to increase the interest rates to attract capital … (then) the private sector investment cost will be higher,” said Marwan Mikhael, head of research at Blominvest.

“And we will reach a time where we are in a vicious circle — higher interest rates to attract capital which will mean higher debt and a higher deficit — it will be non-stop until it explodes.”

Privatisation plans – on governments’ agenda since the end of civil war in 1990 – are also stalled.

Privatising the telecoms sector, which could generate up to $7 billion, is key to cutting public debt. But it has been repeatedly delayed by opposition politicians who say government will be stronger if it has control of key assets.

Analysts and some Lebanese officials estimate that reforming the power sector, which needs structural reform and capital investment, could cost up to $5 billion.

The state-owned Electricity du Liban can only meet two-thirds of peak demand. More than a third of the power it generates gets lost in distribution or is not paid for and tariffs were fixed in 1996 when oil cost $21 a barrel.

The new government believes better results could be achieved through public private partnerships (PPP) rather than privatisation of the power sector, but has yet to implement the policy which would have to be formalised in a law.

Deficient infrastructure also poses an economic risk. The telecoms sector lags most countries in the region in terms of Internet and mobile services due to high prices and scarce capacity, making investors hesitant to establish businesses.

Analysts say investment in the Lebanon is too focused on Beirut and the government needs to invest in infrastructure in other cities. Tourism, which jumped 39 percent in 2009, real estate and banking also attract disproportionate amounts of investment while industry and agriculture are ignored.

“This growth is concentrated in very few square metres in Lebanon … the nice areas of Beirut and a few tourist places,” said George Corm an economist and former finance minister.

“The rest of the country is barren and poverty pockets are … getting bigger year after year because the government’s economic policy does not focus at all on these regions.”

Large sectors of the population in the regions are either living in poverty or very close to it. Corm warns that without investment those people will be an easy target for extremist groups who are increasing their presence.

“Unfortunately neither the IMF, the World Bank or the big donors, nor our government really realise the magnitude of the problem. Everybody is so happy with what is happening to the real estate sector … and with tourism, that we tend to forget the rest of Lebanon,” he said. (Reuters)

Discussion

View Comments for “Lebanon: Growth of the economy at risk without reforms”


Please respect the community. Comments that contain personal attacks or inappropriate language will be removed.
  • http://RottenLebaneseSectarianSystem Sebouh Akharjalian

    I totally agree with Minister Corm that growth in Lebanon is heavily concentrated in the very few square meters in Lebanon and this is neither productive nor healthy for a sustainable future.

    Again let me remind the viewers the comment that I received earlier from Mr. Ghassan Karam in this respect.
    This is concerning the policy of growing the GDP at a slightly larger rate than the debt.
    1. Since the GDP must always grow at a faster rate than the debt whose minimum interest rate is 7% then than the nominal GDP must grow at a larger rate than that, say 8%. This is next to impossibe under normal conditions.
    2. Even if the above is to be accomplished then it will not be of much help because this slightly larger growth rate is applied to a lower base and so the Debt/GDP ratio will drop slightly when the gap between the debt and GDP will increase. Let us illustrate. Assume at the starting point GDP was 30 while debt was 59. Furthermore, assume that GDP grows at 8% each year for 10 years and the debt grows by 7% each for ten years. At the end of the 10 years GDP would have grown to 64.8 and increase of 34.8 while the debt would have become 98.4 an increase of 48.3.
    Our government, central bank and both World bank and IMF and the rest of the propaganda machine are claiming once again that this year Lebanon will witness another 8% nominal GDP growth. Fair enough.
    Now let us examine this so called growth prospect in details.
    For the last few years no doubt Lebanon encountered an increase in capital flows from wealthy Gulf countries and Lebanese expatriates working in the Gulf or abroad. Unfortunately, these flows are being absorbed into unproductive sectors like real-estate, high interest rate Treasury bills, further bank subsidies and other tourism services. Whereas not much is being invested in agriculture or to upgrade our industrial capacity.
    Finally, recently both the World bank and the IMF are strongly urging the Lebanese government to take structural reforms.
    The stuctural reforms are further liberlization of the economy and the privatisation of state assets. This is the only policy that they know in the past they applied these so called Structural Adjustment Programs on Eastern European countries, Russia and Asian countries and the results were devastating to the inhabitants of those countries.
    Personally, I’m against the Privatisation scheme not only from an ideological perspective, but because we are living under a Zuama Clietelism society and I strongly fear that this would pave the way for new corruption ventures for our rulling Zuama elites.

  • AM

    Because we are living under a zuama clientelism society, I think we should go for privatization and encourage competition.
    Imagine if telecom was privatized, MEA, electricity production and distribution…..

  • AM

    Because we are living under a zuama clientelism society, I think we should go for privatization and encourage competition.
    Imagine if telecom was privatized, MEA, electricity production and distribution…..

  • http://rationalrepublic.blogspot.com Ghassan Karam

    There is a major problem with the type of financial flows into Lebanon, which we have dealt with in earlier posts but deserves to be highlighted.

    There is a big difference between financial flows into the country that are undertaken as a result of investment activity and flows into banking deposits attracted by artificially high interest rates. Thr former are more attractive and are much more stable than the latter that are subject to the whims of the investors, the global interest rates and the risk premiums. It appears that a large proportion of the financial flows into Lebanon are seeking higher interest rates and so even the IMF, to its credit, is warning that this is an unpredictable source of financial flows .

    I am glad though that we are moving in the direction of admitting that unless we adopt some major new policies then our sovereign debt is not sustainable , our growth is highly unbalanced and we are witnessing a real estate bubble.

  • http://rationalrepublic.blogspot.com Ghassan Karam

    There is a major problem with the type of financial flows into Lebanon, which we have dealt with in earlier posts but deserves to be highlighted.

    There is a big difference between financial flows into the country that are undertaken as a result of investment activity and flows into banking deposits attracted by artificially high interest rates. Thr former are more attractive and are much more stable than the latter that are subject to the whims of the investors, the global interest rates and the risk premiums. It appears that a large proportion of the financial flows into Lebanon are seeking higher interest rates and so even the IMF, to its credit, is warning that this is an unpredictable source of financial flows .

    I am glad though that we are moving in the direction of admitting that unless we adopt some major new policies then our sovereign debt is not sustainable , our growth is highly unbalanced and we are witnessing a real estate bubble.

  • http://RottenLebaneseSectarianSystem Sebouh Akharjalian

    AM,

    My friend AM eventhough we share huge difference in ideology especially concerning the management of our economy. Let me state my opinion in this respect.

    The Privatisation scheme was introduced and encouraged by the Neoliberal mainstream economists which later influenced these ideas into major institutions like World Bank and IMF.
    First the Neoliberal ideology advocates three essential elements.
    1. Deregulation. Free from all government regulations that harms the Profit interests.
    2. Privatisation. Selling public assets into Private firms.
    3. Cutting taxes for the rich and the reduction of social services.
    That includes social security, Eduction, and Medical Services.
    Now the disadvantages of the Privatization scheme include the following.
    1. Natural Monopoly.
    The most efficient number of firms in some industries, such as tap water is the one. Therefore, it is better to have a public monopoly rather than a private monopoly which can exploit the consumer.
    2. Public interest
    Public services should not be run as profit making bodies. For example, in the case of health care, it is feared privatising health care would mean greater priority is given to profit than patient care.
    3. Public borrowing will increase in the long run because the government no longer gains the profits.
    4. Problem of regulating private monopolies.
    Finally, as you can see the current great financial crisis of 2007-2010 has indeed to some extent undermined the Neoliberal ideology and instead reintroduced the Keynesian political economy.

    AM the only way to dismantle the Zuama Clientelism society in Lebanon is through the abolishment of the sectarian political system and transforming Lebanon into a secular state.

  • AM

    If these capital inflows were directed into investment that would be great. Although these are coming as bank deposits partly due to interest rates, however they have multiple advantages which we should agree about. In part, they are helping in decreasing interest rates which in turn will increase investment. At least this is better than never…

    As for the real estate sector, many studies are done which in turn are explaining most of the price increase as pure demand. For example the terms of lending are not that easy(ask for collateral, 40%-50% downpayment, no extra lending line if house price increased….

    Sebouh, I will pray for a secular state, however I am pretty sure that I won’t witness this in my life time… so i prefer to search for realistic solutions.

  • AM

    If these capital inflows were directed into investment that would be great. Although these are coming as bank deposits partly due to interest rates, however they have multiple advantages which we should agree about. In part, they are helping in decreasing interest rates which in turn will increase investment. At least this is better than never…

    As for the real estate sector, many studies are done which in turn are explaining most of the price increase as pure demand. For example the terms of lending are not that easy(ask for collateral, 40%-50% downpayment, no extra lending line if house price increased….

    Sebouh, I will pray for a secular state, however I am pretty sure that I won’t witness this in my life time… so i prefer to search for realistic solutions.

  • http://rationalrepublic.blogspot.com Ghassan Karam

    AM
    What separates is is not major. It is essentially the old traditional argument whether the glass is half empty or half full.
    We are in basic agreement about where we are but I conclude that it is not sustainable while you conclude that we are moving forward. I sure hope that you are right
    But back to the interest rates. A small country, any small country, cannot afford to have interest rates above the world rate since that will imply that it will be flooded with financial inflows. Lebanon cannot keep attracting all theses funds forever and furthermore must not attract all of these funds since financial inflows are necessitated by current account deficits. Ultimately they are not healthy.

    As for the potential for a real estate bubble you say that studies shpw that it is demand based. Aren’t all bubbles demand based? I agree that real estate financing is not very loose but the prices and the projects are being built partially is response to the excessive liquidity. The result so far, even if the bubble does not burst, are prices that are out of line with income. Very few if any in Lebanon can purchase what is being offered. This never ends well because people start behaving as if they are millionaires, although equity loans and second hand mortgages are not common.
    Loose standards are not common yet but they do exist. One bank is offering real estate loans at 31/2 % and another has loans at 1.5 % subsidized by the EU. I know of a few that have qualified for such loans. These will only make things worse.

    Ideological [urity leads to rigidity. I am afraid that I do not favour Sebouh opposition to privatization on pragmatic grounds. Lebanese government ownership has been disaterous by all respects.No one can even envision an outcome that could be worse than what is happening to government owned enterprises. A thoughtful and well planned privatization coulg be tremendously beneficial to the Lebanese consumerin electricity, air travel, telecommunication etc… If for nothing else it will remve these assets from theinfluence of corruption and graft.

  • http://rationalrepublic.blogspot.com Ghassan Karam

    AM
    What separates is is not major. It is essentially the old traditional argument whether the glass is half empty or half full.
    We are in basic agreement about where we are but I conclude that it is not sustainable while you conclude that we are moving forward. I sure hope that you are right
    But back to the interest rates. A small country, any small country, cannot afford to have interest rates above the world rate since that will imply that it will be flooded with financial inflows. Lebanon cannot keep attracting all theses funds forever and furthermore must not attract all of these funds since financial inflows are necessitated by current account deficits. Ultimately they are not healthy.

    As for the potential for a real estate bubble you say that studies shpw that it is demand based. Aren’t all bubbles demand based? I agree that real estate financing is not very loose but the prices and the projects are being built partially is response to the excessive liquidity. The result so far, even if the bubble does not burst, are prices that are out of line with income. Very few if any in Lebanon can purchase what is being offered. This never ends well because people start behaving as if they are millionaires, although equity loans and second hand mortgages are not common.
    Loose standards are not common yet but they do exist. One bank is offering real estate loans at 31/2 % and another has loans at 1.5 % subsidized by the EU. I know of a few that have qualified for such loans. These will only make things worse.

    Ideological [urity leads to rigidity. I am afraid that I do not favour Sebouh opposition to privatization on pragmatic grounds. Lebanese government ownership has been disaterous by all respects.No one can even envision an outcome that could be worse than what is happening to government owned enterprises. A thoughtful and well planned privatization coulg be tremendously beneficial to the Lebanese consumerin electricity, air travel, telecommunication etc… If for nothing else it will remve these assets from theinfluence of corruption and graft.

  • Tony A

    lebanon must understand that prvatisation might not alwys be the salvation of any system. lebanon must look at other countries with similar situations that have succeeded and see how they got themselves out of their debts.

    privatisation might prove to be volatile when prices will be independently set until the gov’t steps in at a point when they’re way to high as in canada and allowing foreign money to buy our land and then sell it to locals at a much higher rate is not feasible.

    but, if regulations are set at an early date by the government with a ceiling limit for pricing, then ghassan’s theory could be valid.

    we have a beautiful country and we need to focus on tourism. we need to save that heritage site and build more eco-tourism lots for westerners who wanna get away from the hustle and bustle of the city.

    by improving tourism numbers, we also need to stabilise the electricity problem once and for all and establish a mandate that appeals to all thus bringing instant money.

    these are 2 areas that if worked on will bring in serious money though not enough but it’s a start.

    ghassan, i always agree with the slow and steady wins the race theory which includes safe banking investments. those are for sure excellent temptations for the conservative investor.

    with regulations and ceiling limits set by the gov’t, we can invite the telecommuniation sector to grow.

    but with all these hungry wolves at the helm we call our leaders, nothing will be accomplished until they bankrupt lebanon and syria will have to buy the country and become its owner cos our leaders are all retarded.

  • Tony A

    lebanon must understand that prvatisation might not alwys be the salvation of any system. lebanon must look at other countries with similar situations that have succeeded and see how they got themselves out of their debts.

    privatisation might prove to be volatile when prices will be independently set until the gov’t steps in at a point when they’re way to high as in canada and allowing foreign money to buy our land and then sell it to locals at a much higher rate is not feasible.

    but, if regulations are set at an early date by the government with a ceiling limit for pricing, then ghassan’s theory could be valid.

    we have a beautiful country and we need to focus on tourism. we need to save that heritage site and build more eco-tourism lots for westerners who wanna get away from the hustle and bustle of the city.

    by improving tourism numbers, we also need to stabilise the electricity problem once and for all and establish a mandate that appeals to all thus bringing instant money.

    these are 2 areas that if worked on will bring in serious money though not enough but it’s a start.

    ghassan, i always agree with the slow and steady wins the race theory which includes safe banking investments. those are for sure excellent temptations for the conservative investor.

    with regulations and ceiling limits set by the gov’t, we can invite the telecommuniation sector to grow.

    but with all these hungry wolves at the helm we call our leaders, nothing will be accomplished until they bankrupt lebanon and syria will have to buy the country and become its owner cos our leaders are all retarded.

  • Jamil

    I highly recommend you all read the Confessions of an Economic Hit Man a book written by John Perkins and published in 2004. He talks about an economic system based on greed, bribery, power, and control, in the name of privatizing, improving lives, and debt for ever and ever..

    Here is link

    http://www.amazon.com/Confessions-Economic-Hit-John-Perkins/dp/1576753018

  • Jamil

    I highly recommend you all read the Confessions of an Economic Hit Man a book written by John Perkins and published in 2004. He talks about an economic system based on greed, bribery, power, and control, in the name of privatizing, improving lives, and debt for ever and ever..

    Here is link

    http://www.amazon.com/Confessions-Economic-Hit-John-Perkins/dp/1576753018

  • Jamil

    All,,

    Why Lebanese entrepreneurs small or large excel outside Lebanon but fail in their own country.

  • Jamil

    All,,

    Why Lebanese entrepreneurs small or large excel outside Lebanon but fail in their own country.

  • http://RottenLebaneseSectarianSystem Sebouh Akharjalian

    Hi Jamil,

    I have read the Confessions of an Economic hit-man.

    May I recommend further reading on John Perkins latests books.

    The Secret History of American Empire by John Perkins

    His latest Hoodwinked published in 2009

blog comments powered by Disqus
ArabicChinese (Simplified)EnglishFrenchGermanItalianPersianRussianSpanishTurkish

Translate Ya Libnan


Advertise With Us


Follow Ya Libnan on Twitter @ya_libnan

Recent Comments

Ya Libnan Café Ya Libnan Online Shop